CASE STUDY 7 Robert is preparing a speech about legalizing marijuana use in the United States. He knows that his roommate wrote a paper on the topic last semester and asks his roommate about the paper in an attempt to gather information. During his speech Robert orally cites his roommate by name as a source of his information but does not report that the source is his roommate, whose experience is based on writing a paper. In what ways does Robert's behavior violate the guidelines set out in the NCA Credo for Ethical Communication? Can you think of a time when you intended to have a "good" end and employed "good' means, but you ended up accomplishing a "bad "end? __ Why do you think our ends are not always in line with our intentions?

Question

CASE STUDY 7 Robert is preparing a speech about legalizing marijuana use in the United States. He knows that his roommate wrote a paper on the topic last semester and asks his roommate about the paper in an attempt to gather information. During his speech Robert orally cites his roommate by name as a source of his information but does not report that the source is his roommate, whose experience is based on writing a paper. In what ways does Robert's behavior violate the guidelines set out in the NCA Credo for Ethical Communication? Can you think of a time when you intended to have a "good" end and employed "good' means, but you ended up accomplishing a "bad "end? __ Why do you think our ends are not always in line with our intentions?

Answer 1

1. Robert's behavior violates the NCA Credo for Ethical Communication by not being transparent about his source of information, misrepresenting the source of his information, and not giving proper credit to his roommate.2. This question is subjective and depends on personal experiences.3. Our ends are not always in line with our intentions due to external circumstances, personal biases, or the complexity of the situation.

Answer 2

1. Robert's behavior violates the NCA Credo for Ethical Communication in several ways. Firstly, he is not being transparent about his source of information, which is a violation of the principle of honesty. Secondly, he is misrepresenting the source of his information, which is a violation of the principle of respect for others. Lastly, he is not giving proper credit to his roommate, which is a violation of the principle of fairness.2. This question is subjective and depends on personal experiences. However, it is a common occurrence where good intentions lead to bad outcomes due to unforeseen circumstances or lack of knowledge.3. Our ends are not always in line with our intentions due to a variety of factors. These can include external circumstances, personal biases, or the complexity of the situation. Additionally, our intentions may not always be clear or accurately communicated, leading to misunderstandings and misinterpretations.

Вопрос

Решения

Ответ

Объяснение