Write main elements of a claim in the case of medical negligence 2 What kind of medical research is regulated by the law? 3 Write the international acts declaring (regulating)) human rights 4 Is it possible to donate organs for reward? 5 How is medical research regulated? 6 Is there any moral difference between acting to achieve a goal and omitting to act, knowing It will produce the same result?

1. Main elements of a claim in the case of medical negligence:<br />- Duty of care: The healthcare provider owed a duty of care to the patient.<br />- Breach of duty: The healthcare provider breached that duty by failing to provide the standard of care.<br />- Causation: The breach of duty directly caused harm to the patient.<br />- Damages: The patient suffered actual harm or injury as a result of the breach of duty.<br /><br />2. Medical research regulated by the law:<br />Clinical trials involving human subjects are regulated by laws such as the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, and various national regulations like the FDA's regulations in the United States. These regulations ensure the safety, rights, and welfare of trial subjects.<br /><br />3. International acts declaring (regulating) human rights:<br />- Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)<br />- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)<br />- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)<br /><br />4. Organ donation for reward:<br />Organ donation for reward is generally prohibited in most jurisdictions. The ethical and legal principles surrounding organ transplantation prioritize the principles of equity, fairness, and the prevention of commercialization of the human body.<br /><br />5. Regulation of medical research:<br />Medical research is regulated to ensure the safety and rights of participants, the integrity of the research, and the quality of the data. Regulatory bodies, such as the Institutional Review Board (IRB) in the United States, oversee the review and approval of research protocols to ensure compliance with ethical standards and legal requirements.<br /><br />6. Moral difference between acting to achieve a goal and omitting to act, knowing it will produce the same result:<br />This is a classic ethical dilemma related to the principle of "letting die" versus "killing." Generally, there is considered to be a moral difference between actively causing harm and passively allowing harm to occur. However, the specifics can vary depending on the context and ethical frameworks applied.